RepackboxLee PrecisionLoad DataReloading Everything
WidenersMidSouth Shooters SupplySnyders JerkyRotoMetals2
Titan Reloading Inline Fabrication
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 44

Thread: wasting tin

  1. #21
    Boolit Master
    DerekP Houston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    2,877
    Quote Originally Posted by The O.K. KIDD View Post
    that got everybody to settle down, it isn't your alloys I am using, I just had a question, and I can hear you all screaming through the computer, STOP WASTING THE PRECIOUS TIN!PLEASE! lol I will mix some lead with the pucks or muffin ingots though, but it will be 2:1 tinned:lead or WW
    meh it's your money and alloy do what you like . Best part of lead/boolits is someone will eventually mine that berm and recycle it. I don't know the exact mix of any of my range scrap. I cast a ton of my bulk pewter into 4oz chunks. Every 20lbs or so I toss in another piece of tin. Dunno if it is needed, it adds ~1% to my mix. I'm a creature of habit so since it has worked I've seen no need to change it. I purchases some "hardball" lead when I started and used it for all my 9mm casting.

    I won't lie if I said it wasn't very entertaining posting up tiny groups at the range.

  2. #22
    Boolit Man wadcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by dragon813gt View Post
    The past is the past and metal prices were a lot lower.
    That's not really true. In the 70's and early 80's tin prices where kept artificially high by the ITC, an OPEC-like organization which agreed on tin production and storage volumes to keep the prices high. Adjusted for inflation, tin prices are not that high. They have certainly gone up in the short term, but are back on the way down.

    In any case, the cost of wasting a few percent of tin is negligible. For example, let's say you shoot 150 grain boolits. With 2% tin, you use .34 cents per round of tin. With 5% you use .86 cents of tin per round. Assuming you shoot about 2000 of these a year, the total "wasted" tin cost is $10 per year.

    I certainly wouldn't bother melting down the ingots if it were me.

  3. #23
    Boolit Master fryboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    3 1/2 miles out past the stix on the 9.9
    Posts
    2,774
    Umm amigo ? About that math ...round,pound or common core ?
    As for the OP ...you did ask...that most state you're wasting tin isn't really yelling per say ( that'd be - YOU'RE WASTING TIN !!!!!! ) please don't take it personally,some of us have lots of it and some of us have to buy it at the going rate of retail @ $20 +shipping a pound ( ouch ) the main things are your casting/shooting is successful AND you're happy with the result
    Je suis Charlie

    " To sit in judgment of those things which you perceive to be wrong or imperfect is to be one more person who is part of judgment, evil or imperfection."
    Wayne Dyer
    if it was easy would it be as worthy ? or as long of lasting impression ? the hardest of lessons are the best of teachers [shrugz]
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLzFhOslZPM

  4. #24
    In Remembrance
    montana_charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West of Great Falls, Montana
    Posts
    8,414
    Quote Originally Posted by The O.K. KIDD View Post
    ok so I made a good size batch of 50-50-5% tin and people on here say I am wasting the tin, I have it in there for plasticity and to keep it from fracturing. I really don't want to melt that first batch down, about 75-80lbs of muffin ingots!so tell me why I should lower the amount on my next batches when peope used to use up to 16-1? thanks
    We who shoot black powder cartridge rifles (BPCR) are fond of soft, lead/tin alloys for our bullets.
    As a group, there is little love for antimonal mixes ... but that is beginning to change.

    A well-known BPCR shooter, experimenter, and bullet designer died about a year ago.
    He was the kind of experimenter who absolutely did everything imaginable to maintain control of a process, and eliminate factors that could skew results.

    This relates to you because he did some experiments on bullet alloys. Most of those were the lead/tin types that most of us use, but he also did an extended hardness stability program that produced one undeniable result, which is ...

    An alloy that contains unequal amounts of tin and antimony will vary in hardness, getting harder AND softer, over time.
    When the amount of antimony and tin are equal, the alloy hardens initially, up to a point where it stays for over a year (the length of the experiment).

    He (Dan Theodore) created this graph to provide a visual image of what the alloys do.


    Retired...TWICE. Now just raisin' cows and livin' on borrowed time.

  5. #25
    Boolit Master
    JSnover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sicklerville NJ
    Posts
    4,384
    My understanding is that any hardness/toughness from tin is maxed out at about 40%, especially in a binary (only two elements) alloy. You have a tertiary (three elements) alloy and that 5% antimony is doing a lot more for you than the tin is.
    That said, you are using more tin than you need and talking to guys who have made it their mission in life to do this as cheaply as they can (myself included). Keep casting it this way if you want but we're telling you the truth when we say you can get the same results with a lot less tin in your boolits.
    Warning: I know Judo. If you force me to prove it I'll shoot you.

  6. #26
    Boolit Master Oklahoma Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    outside of Sand Springs, N.E. OK
    Posts
    2,353
    ok, thankyou, im not takeingg any of this offensively(spl?) so don't worry about that, after reading all of this I have decided to reduce tin use in the future, but not gonna wast my time on re melting the 80lbs I made. I like the old way of doing things, and if I could afford enough pure lead, I would be shooting 1-20 like they use to, maybe 1-30. but I had to supplement some WW's in there because they are free.so if the antimony in those makes that much difference, which it does,after hearing everyones experience, then I will start mixing 1.5-2% and use the saved money for more lead. thank you guys for explaining it thoroughly, alloying and the end results can sometimes get confuseing for me, like age hardening AND softening?! heard of one or the other but not both.ok well thanks again, and you all have a good day. Travis in Tulsa
    An armed man in a citizen.
    An unarmed man is a subject.
    A disarmed man is a slave.

  7. #27
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    I'm not trying to get you wrapped up about excess tin in your alloy.
    I was pointing you towards the pit-falls of the unbalanced 2 part alloy.
    if you understand how the alloy's work, the hardening and softening makes perfect sense.
    it's like trying to wrap your head around antimonial migration.
    or how tin breaks through dendrite walls to allow better fill-out of a mold.
    [the alloy is starting to set up and still flowing at the same time]

  8. #28
    Moderator
    RogerDat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Michigan Lansing Area
    Posts
    5,759
    I guess some of it has to do with how plentiful the specific item is as to how much value we place on it. Some folks have a slim supply of WW's so they cut them with plain for pistol or cut them and water drop. Others have lots of WW's and not much plain. Or hit a big batch of Linotype so cast a lot of lino or hardball alloy. Or these same people are swapping for some soft because printers lead they have, plain soft lead they can't find for love nor money.

    I'm sort of a waste not want not type guy. Doesn't matter how much of some component I have I won't use more than I need for a desired result, I also sad to say will seldom walk away from a good deal on more. I can't get the bullet to cast with noticeably more shine or sharper edges by adding more tin, so I don't. All I do with more tin is make bullets lighter in weight. But I'm not the OP, my stash is not his stash, and what is more important his stash is not mine. Unless he wants to send his stash to me and I promise I will give it a good "forever" home.... in a berm.

    I let my family know what my stuff is and what it is worth, heck how much weight, and where located is all kept in a spread sheet. I print it off every time I make any big change like doing a big batch of one alloy or another. Or melting some more scrap or pewter to add to it. I have some of those Bell System Seam solder bars, and some Dutch Boy 777 stuff. Probably won't use it unless I run low on other stuff. It is neat, on a shelf or in a bullet either way.

    There is probably a point (or several) where OP can get some nice bullets, suitable to his use, with less tin, or maybe a Pb/Sn alloy without Sb. He indicated he may try cutting the existing stuff a bit with plain. Nothing wrong with a nice 3/3/94 alloy for a hunting bullet. Probably make a nice HP too. Taking that down to less alloy, more Pb might yield even better performance in some guns using a heavy bullet at lower velocities. And we all know it is fun to experiment. Isn't that what old milk jugs are for? To fill with water and shoot for testing the overall wallop?
    Scrap.... because all the really pithy and emphatic four letter words were taken and we had to describe this source of casting material somehow so we added an "S" to what non casters and wives call what we collect.

    Kind of hard to claim to love America while one is hating half the Americans that disagree with you. One nation indivisible requires work.

    Feedback page http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...light=RogerDat

  9. #29
    Boolit Master 6622729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by RogerDat View Post
    I have some of those Bell System Seam solder bars, and some Dutch Boy 777 stuff.
    Any idea what the difference is between the Bell System "E" Wiping Solder and the Bell System "C" Seam Solder?

  10. #30
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    2 numbers err letters.

    probably 10% some were 40% tin and some 50% tin.

  11. #31
    Boolit Master 6622729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by runfiverun View Post
    I'm not trying to get you wrapped up about excess tin in your alloy.
    I was pointing you towards the pit-falls of the unbalanced 2 part alloy.
    if you understand how the alloy's work, the hardening and softening makes perfect sense.
    it's like trying to wrap your head around antimonial migration.
    or how tin breaks through dendrite walls to allow better fill-out of a mold.
    [the alloy is starting to set up and still flowing at the same time]
    Yes, I find myself working towards a balanced alloy of about 5% Tin, 5% Antimony and 90% lead. By experience I find myself working towards Lyman #2 alloy! At least, that is my intent. It can be tough with all of the wild guesses one has to take using scrap materials from multiple sources. I'm shooting good and not leading either gun so I must be close. I'm casting 9mm handgun (Glock 19) and 30 caliber AR15 in 300AAC.

  12. #32
    Boolit Master 6622729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by runfiverun View Post
    2 numbers err letters.

    probably 10% some were 40% tin and some 50% tin.
    Well, I do know the wiping solder "E" alloy is 37.5-40% tin. I'm not familiar with the "C" seam alloy hence the question.

  13. #33
    Banned








    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    munising Michigan
    Posts
    17,725
    ill go this way. back when I had lots of linotype and tin I tended to use it more. In my opinion (for what its worth) an alloy with 5 percent tin might just cast a bit better then one with 2percnt. Now the difference is small but bottom line if you want to be honest plain old ww casts just fine with no tin added. So does pure. its more of a matter of getting your temp right to get good fillout then the amount of tin added. Anymore my tin stash doesn't get depleted very fast. I use it mostly to make something like #2. I just personaly think its a waste of money in any percentage to add to something like ww. To be totally honest if I had some linotype to make #2 out of I could live the rest of my casting life without a single ounce of tin.
    Last edited by Lloyd Smale; 05-18-2016 at 03:31 PM.

  14. #34
    Boolit Grand Master
    bangerjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    out of here, wandering somewhere in the SW.
    Posts
    10,164
    Fresh lino alloy is 12% Sb & 4% Sn, so anytime one is using lino, they are adding Sn. That is one of the reasons lino metal is so popular with casters.....you kill 2 birds with one stone. I value the 12% Sb for adding to the hardness more than the small amount of Sn in there.


    I get far better quality fills with ~2% Sn in COWW (normally only ~0.5% Sn) mixes. That 2%, added to pre-heated to full casting temp molds and correct temp alloys, yields darned good boolits every time for me.

    Have fun casting!

  15. #35
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Amarillo, Tx
    Posts
    688
    Quote Originally Posted by The O.K. KIDD View Post
    ok so I made a good size batch of 50-50-5% tin and people on here say I am wasting the tin, I have it in there for plasticity and to keep it from fracturing. I really don't want to melt that first batch down, about 75-80lbs of muffin ingots!so tell me why I should lower the amount on my next batches when peope used to use up to 16-1? thanks

    Ummmm....50/50 5% is 105 percent. If I read you correctly. Otherwise, we have no idea of your mixture. Tell us the weights you are using.

  16. #36
    Boolit Master 6622729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by scottfire1957 View Post
    Ummmm....50/50 5% is 105 percent. If I read you correctly. Otherwise, we have no idea of your mixture. Tell us the weights you are using.
    No, I think he meant he made a batch of 50% COWW with 50% soft lead and adjusted the mix to end up with 5% tin in it.

  17. #37
    Boolit Master 6622729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    583
    I made just under 25lbs of my best guess 5% tin, 5% antimony and 90% lead from my materials on hand. The ingots ring like a bell and are harder than COWW. I think I got close to true Lyman #2 which is what I was shooting for. Not bad for mixing forklift battery inter-cell connectors with monotype and wiping solder. Lol.

    I don't consider it wasting tin. I consider it making the best alloy I can.

  18. #38
    Boolit Master Oklahoma Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    outside of Sand Springs, N.E. OK
    Posts
    2,353
    thanks 6622729, that is what I meant, and yesterday I mixed a batch of half 50-50, half pure, with 3% tin. haven't tested it yet. also what do you think the sb content of 50-50, or 50%WW-50Pure is?
    An armed man in a citizen.
    An unarmed man is a subject.
    A disarmed man is a slave.

  19. #39
    Boolit Master Cowboy_Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by The O.K. KIDD View Post
    thanks 6622729, that is what I meant, and yesterday I mixed a batch of half 50-50, half pure, with 3% tin. haven't tested it yet. also what do you think the sb content of 50-50, or 50%WW-50Pure is?
    50/50 COWW/pure should have about 1.25-1.5% Sb, if memory serves and the alloy calculator has it right.
    "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for everyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence."
    -W. K. Clifford "The Ethics of Belief"

    "They hate you if you're clever, and they despise a fool."
    -John Lennon "A Working Class Hero"

  20. #40
    Boolit Master


    HangFireW8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Maryland
    Posts
    2,587
    Due to the move of local electronics manufacturers to ROHS, I am awash in tin. Thinking of it as expensive is hard, as I can buy it, or sell it, for the same price as lead at my local scrapyard.
    I give loading advice based on my actual results in factory rifles with standard chambers, twist rates and basic accurizing.
    My goals for using cast boolits are lots of good, cheap, and reasonably accurate shooting, while avoiding overly tedious loading processes.
    The BHN Deformation Formula, and why I don't use it.
    How to find and fix sizing die eccentricity problems.
    Do you trust your casting thermometer?
    A few musings.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check